Air Force
Men
-
Women
2012
-
2013 -
2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
195 |
Hannah Everson |
SO |
20:22 |
358 |
Annette Eichenberger |
SR |
20:43 |
719 |
Heather Connick |
JR |
21:14 |
721 |
Lindy Long |
FR |
21:14 |
805 |
Taylor Drolshagen |
JR |
21:20 |
838 |
Samantha Skold |
FR |
21:23 |
939 |
Rebecca Esselstein |
JR |
21:29 |
1,822 |
Kirsten Linnartz |
FR |
22:24 |
2,133 |
Emily Wagemaker |
SO |
22:44 |
|
National Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 10 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 20 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Regional Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 in Regional |
25.8% |
Top 10 in Regional |
94.4% |
Top 20 in Regional |
100.0% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Hannah Everson |
Annette Eichenberger |
Heather Connick |
Lindy Long |
Taylor Drolshagen |
Samantha Skold |
Rebecca Esselstein |
Kirsten Linnartz |
Emily Wagemaker |
Rocky Mountain Shootout |
09/28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23:17 |
Wisconsin adidas Invitational |
10/19 |
1049 |
20:23 |
20:57 |
21:17 |
21:24 |
21:23 |
21:47 |
21:20 |
22:09 |
|
Mountain West Championships |
11/01 |
937 |
20:08 |
20:25 |
21:27 |
21:20 |
21:21 |
21:16 |
21:54 |
22:46 |
22:28 |
Mountain Region Championships |
11/15 |
999 |
20:30 |
20:43 |
21:03 |
21:02 |
21:17 |
21:12 |
21:24 |
|
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
NCAA Championship |
0.1% |
29.2 |
767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Region Championship |
100% |
6.9 |
213 |
|
|
1.6 |
7.0 |
17.2 |
23.6 |
18.1 |
12.7 |
8.8 |
5.5 |
3.6 |
1.3 |
0.7 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Results
NCAA Championship | Advances to Round | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
---|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Hannah Everson |
28.4% |
125.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annette Eichenberger |
1.0% |
164.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heather Connick |
0.1% |
233.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lindy Long |
0.1% |
239.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taylor Drolshagen |
0.1% |
228.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Samantha Skold |
0.1% |
244.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rebecca Esselstein |
0.1% |
250.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Hannah Everson |
15.4 |
|
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.6 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
2.1 |
3.0 |
3.5 |
4.0 |
5.7 |
6.4 |
6.9 |
6.6 |
6.4 |
5.9 |
5.8 |
5.5 |
5.0 |
4.9 |
4.0 |
3.4 |
3.0 |
2.5 |
2.0 |
Annette Eichenberger |
28.8 |
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.9 |
0.9 |
1.4 |
1.6 |
2.1 |
2.2 |
3.1 |
2.7 |
3.0 |
3.7 |
3.4 |
4.1 |
4.1 |
Heather Connick |
54.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
Lindy Long |
55.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
Taylor Drolshagen |
62.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Samantha Skold |
64.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
Rebecca Esselstein |
72.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
3 |
1.6% |
5.1% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
|
1.5 |
|
0.1 |
3 |
4 |
7.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
4 |
5 |
17.2% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
5 |
6 |
23.6% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.6 |
|
|
6 |
7 |
18.1% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.1 |
|
|
7 |
8 |
12.7% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
8 |
9 |
8.8% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
9 |
10 |
5.5% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
10 |
11 |
3.6% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
11 |
12 |
1.3% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
12 |
13 |
0.7% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
13 |
14 |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
14 |
15 |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
Total |
100% |
0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
|
99.9 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Received By Beating | Chance Received | Average If >0 | Average |
Northwestern |
0.0% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
|
Total |
|
|
0.0 |
|
Minimum |
|
|
0.0 |
Maximum |
|
|
1.0 |